Banks Say Gambling Prohibition Act Bad for Biz

Enforcement May Hurt National Security

Members of the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) are trying to get the word out to Congress they do not like how the government sees the roles of banks when it comes to enforcing Internet Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act, if it’s passed by Congress.

And they recently warned politicians that if financial institutions were responsible for monitoring and blocking transactions to gambling websites, banks would have trouble meeting their other duties, including helping provide national security.

“ICBA recognizes the concerns that some of your colleagues have raised about Internet gambling,” ICBA wrote in a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Penn.). “We urge Congress to recognize that the nation’s banks have already taken on major responsibilities to help detect and prevent terrorist financing and illegal money laundering. Attempting to monitor and block gambling transactions, particularly given the limits of the current payment technology, could detract from those efforts.”

Sam Vallandingham, the vice president of the First State Bank in West Virginia and a member of the ICBA, told a house judiciary subcommittee hearing just as much in May. But it doesn’t seem like the politicians are listening. The subcommittee moved the Act forward and it was passed by the House of Representatives later that month, despite his concerns.

© Copyright 2007 Gambling Central's material. It may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

$500 Welcome bonus, fabulous table and card games, great jackpots!